Getting Started
Getting Started
To join the bitcoin network and start using the currency, all a user has to do is download
an application or use a web application. Because bitcoin is a standard, there are many
implementations of the bitcoin client software. There is also a reference implementation,
also known as the Satoshi client, which is managed as an open source project by a team
of developers and is derived from the original implementation written by Satoshi Nakamoto.
The three main forms of bitcoin clients are:
Full client
A full client, or “full node,” is a client that stores the entire history of bitcoin trans‐
actions (every transaction by every user, ever), manages the users’ wallets, and can
initiate transactions directly on the bitcoin network. This is similar to a standalone
email server, in that it handles all aspects of the protocol without relying on any
other servers or third-party services.
Lightweight client
A lightweight client stores the user’s wallet but relies on third-party–owned servers
for access to the bitcoin transactions and network. The light client does not store a
full copy of all transactions and therefore must trust the third-party servers for
transaction validation. This is similar to a standalone email client that connects to
a mail server for access to a mailbox, in that it relies on a third party for interactions
with the network.
Web client
Web clients are accessed through a web browser and store the user’s wallet on a
server owned by a third party. This is similar to webmail in that it relies entirely on
a third-party server.
Mobile Bitcoin
Mobile clients for smartphones, such as those based on the Android system, can either
operate as full clients, lightweight clients, or web clients. Some mobile clients are
synchronized with a web or desktop client, providing a multiplatform wallet across
multiple devices but with a common source of funds.
The choice of bitcoin client depends on how much control the user wants over funds, the next link shows the different choices - Choose your Wallet.
A full client will offer the highest level of control and independence for the user, but in
turn puts the burden of backups and security on the user. On the other end of the range
of choices, a web client is the easiest to set up and use, but the trade-off with a web client
is that counterparty risk is introduced because security and control is shared with the
user and the owner of the web service. If a web-wallet service is compromised, as many have been, the users can lose all their funds. Conversely, if users have a full client without
adequate backups, they might lose their funds through a computer mishap.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario